Data
2026 Field Analytics
Search, compare, and sort tournament teams across rankings, efficiency, résumé, and derived intelligence signals.
Teams Shown
0
Default Sort
Composite Rank
Current Sort
composite rank
Team Comparison
Select two teams to compare profile, rankings, intelligence, and matchup projection.
Select two teams to activate the comparison view.
No teams matched your search.
| Archetypes | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No teams matched your search. | ||||||||||||||||||
Reference
Data Dictionary
Quick-reference guide for the rankings, derived metrics, and archetypes used on this page.
KenPom Rank
Lower is better. Efficiency-based ranking built from adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency.
BPI Rank
Lower is better. ESPN-style power indicator intended to reflect team strength and future performance quality.
NET Rank
Lower is better. NCAA sorting tool that incorporates efficiency, results, and opponent quality.
Composite Rank
Lower is better. Internal blended average of KenPom, BPI, and NET to smooth out single-source bias.
Off Efficiency
Higher is better. Estimated offensive points generated per 100 possessions.
Def Efficiency
Lower is better. Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions.
Adj Tempo
Higher means faster pace. Reflects estimated possessions per game after adjustment.
SOS Net Rating
Higher is better. Indicates stronger schedule quality and résumé difficulty.
Quad 1 / Quad 2
Résumé buckets tied to opponent quality and game location. Stronger records indicate better win quality.
Value Score
Higher is better. Internal measure of how much stronger a team looks than its seed baseline suggests.
Risk Score
Lower is better. Internal volatility / fragility indicator driven by defense, résumé quality, and seed inflation risk.
Upset Score
Higher is better for underdogs. Internal signal for teams with the tools to outperform seed expectations.
Contender Score
Higher is better. Internal measure of true deep-run or title-path strength.
Elite Offense
Team projects as a top-end offensive unit.
Elite Defense
Team projects as a top-end defensive unit.
Balanced Contender
Team shows both strong offensive and defensive profile strength.
Tempo Pressure
Team tends to play with pace and can stress slower opponents.
Undervalued Seed
Seed may underrate the team’s underlying profile.
Fragile Resume
Profile shows vulnerability despite seed or surface résumé.
High Variance Team
Team may carry big ceiling but also greater outcome volatility.
Bracket Buster
Lower-seeded team with traits that support upset potential.
Analytics Darling
Team rates especially well across blended analytic measures and résumé quality.
Title Threat
Team has the profile of a legitimate championship-level contender.